![]() ![]() RASKIN: Well, look - as a fellow professor of constitutional law - this is what I did for a quarter century before I ran for Congress - I was quite amazed by the performance of Mr. Can you answer that simple question simply? Why does it need to be done by the end of December? Turley also said something very simply - he said, no one has said why this needs to be done by December. KING: Let me follow up on that because Mr. So I know that the other side would like to tie us up for the next several months and the next several years or decades in court, but we're simply not going to play on that schedule. We have never before had a president who has committed such obstruction, withholding of evidence, blockading of witnesses in an impeachment or in oversight activity, generally. RASKIN: Look - we have demonstrated heroic patience in the face of the most extraordinary and wholesale obstructionism by the White House that Americans have seen in our entire history. Why not go to court? Why not get the testimony of people like former National Security Adviser John Bolton, Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, and give Congress the opportunity to make that stronger case? KING: I mean, he's saying, you're moving too fast. JONATHAN TURLEY: They should have subpoenaed and gone to court over people like John Bolton and gotten a court order. Here's what he told my co-host Rachel Martin yesterday. Constitutional lawyer Jonathan Turley was one of the scholars who testified before the Judiciary Committee this week. KING: Let's talk a bit more about process. So they keep whining about the process, but the process has really been fair from Day 1. So it's been scrupulously, meticulously fair from the beginning.Īnd, you know, unfortunately, our colleagues don't like the hand they've been dealt by the president's outrageous misconduct, and so they don't want people focusing on what Donald Trump actually did in shaking down the Ukrainian government to come and get involved in this presidential election in America. And then our members got time to question, and their members got time to question. You know, I was in those closed-door depositions, and I saw the majority lawyer get an hour for questioning and the minority lawyer get an hour for questioning. KING: So your colleague Doug Collins is saying, the American people need to believe that you have gone about this process fairly, or the outcome is going to be tainted people will be shaken. He sits on the House Judiciary Committee. Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland is a Democrat. KING: Representative Collins was talking to my colleague Mary Louise Kelly on All Things Considered yesterday. But the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, Representative Doug Collins of Georgia, is already raising a big concern.ĭOUG COLLINS: Whether we agree with the end result or not, that's the one thing that I think if I was looking at it from an outsider to the Democrats, say - you may have your case and you might want to impeach, but at the end of the day, if people don't believe what you're doing is fair, then it doesn't matter. On Monday, the House Judiciary Committee will hear presentations of evidence from House Judiciary and Intelligence Committee lawyers. They will define the scope of the charges against the president. KING: As she said, the next step is the articles of impeachment. NANCY PELOSI: Sadly, but with confidence and humility, with allegiance to our founders and a heart full of love for America, today, I am asking our chairman to proceed with articles of impeachment. Here is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday announcing the start of formal impeachment proceedings against President Trump. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |